Optimizing Chronic Pain Treatment with Enhanced Neuroplastic Responsiveness: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Department of Community of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy. Department of Aging & Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Counseling and Wellness Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Nutrients. 2021;(5)
Full text from:

Abstract

Chronic pain affects mental and physical health and alters brain structure and function. Interventions that reduce chronic pain are also associated with changes in the brain. A number of non-invasive strategies can promote improved learning and memory and increase neuroplasticity in older adults. Intermittent fasting and glucose administration represent two such strategies with the potential to optimize the neurobiological environment to increase responsiveness to recognized pain treatments. The purpose of the pilot study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of intermittent fasting and glucose administration paired with a recognized pain treatment activity, relaxation and guided imagery. A total of 32 adults (44% W, 56% M), 50 to 85 years of age, with chronic knee pain for three months or greater participated in the study. Four sessions were completed over an approximate two-week period. Findings indicate the ability to recruit, randomize, and retain participants in the protocol. The procedures and measures were reasonable and completed without incident. Participant adherence was high and exit interview feedback positive. In summary, the pilot study was feasible and acceptable, providing the evidence necessary to move forward with a larger clinical trial.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Randomized Controlled Trial

Metadata